Ex-NFL Players Sound Off Against Ban on Controversial Tackle Method
The NFL announced Monday that team owners had voted to outlaw a version of the “hip drop” tackle technique that caused a pair of high-profile injuries last season, saying the method—while incredibly effective in bringing a runner down—is 25 times more likely to cause injury than other tackles.
The method, in which defenders wrap a runner with both hands and then unweights them by swiveling and dropping their hips, will now be a 15-yard unnecessary roughness penalty in games next season. Fines and suspensions can also be assessed, depending on the severity of the tackle.
The tackle style was widely credited as the reason behind the injuries of the Dallas Cowboys running back Tony Pollard and the star Baltimore Ravens tight end Mark Andrews, whose injury was watched by millions in a primetime game in November.Andrews spoke about the tackle this offseason, insisting he didn’t blame the Cincinnati Bengals’ Logan Wilson for using the method on
him. He called it an “unfortunate event” that stemmed from Wilson “playing hard.”
The hit knocked Andrews, a key piece on a top AFC team, out for months—sparking debate on whether the NFL’s rules committee should act on the method in the offseason.
The NFL did just that on Monday, much to the dismay of countless pundits and former players. That included the linebacker-turned-analyst Emmanuel Acho, who sounded off in a rant to X that a “hip-drop tackle” is just a tackle, nothing more.
“There is no such thing as a hip drop tackle—only a tackle,” he said. “We created this name hip drop tackle to try to vilify something that’s just a tackle. The game of football has been in existence for roughly, what, 100 years? And all of a sudden there’s a hip-drop tackle. There’s no such thing. It’s literally literally just a tackle.”